微信内可能无法直接打开本站。请点右上角 ··· → 在浏览器打开,或复制链接。
Quantifying geographic domain shift to decouple the geospatial transferability of human mobility flow generation models
RSS 官方收录 · 可信分层展示
关键摘要
arXiv:2608.21567v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Human mobility serves as an essential proxy for understanding social, economic, and environmental dynamics in urban systems.…
- Geospatial transferability, which measures a model's capability in a n…
- However, few studies have studied the intrinsic characteristics of geo…
- To this end, this study systematically investigates the geospatial tra…
摘要引擎:抽取
正文提要
arXiv:2608.21567v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Human mobility serves as an essential proxy for understanding social, economic, and environmental dynamics in urban systems. Geospatial transferability, which measures a model's capability in a new location or unseen region, is a critical dimension for comparing different human mobility generation models. However, few studies have studied the intrinsic characteristics of geospatial transferability. To this end, this study systematically investigates the geospatial transferability of four representative human mobility generation models using a large-scale benchmark dataset of census tract level commuting flows across 2265 counties in the United States. Inspired by the domain adaptation theory in machine learning, we introduce geographic domain shift to describe the intrinsic differences in geographic feature distributions and spatial structures between source and target regions, which may jointly affect model transferability. Moreover, we propose two metrics, mutual information and spatial shift, to quantify the geographic domain shift. To examine their associations with model transferability, we employ linear mixed-effects regression to analyze the associations between geographic domain shifts and transferability. Our results reveal substantial spatial heterogeneity and asymmetry in transfer performance across regions. Both information shift and spatial shift exhibit statistically significant and complementary explanatory power. This indicates that geospatial transferability depends not only on model design but also on intrinsic geographic differences. These findings provide a novel methodological framework for evaluating and improving the geospatial transferability of human mobility generation models and support more robust and fair human mobility data synthesis across diverse regions. It also offers insights on spatial transferability for GeoAI model development.