Skip to main content
Aggregate arXiv cs.AI 人工智能 24 Aug 2026 - 12:00

Interpretable Multimodal Classification with Linear Discriminant Tree Ensembles

RSS 官方收录 · 可信分层展示

关键摘要

arXiv:2608.…

  • 20384v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multimodal affect and behaviour c…
  • While Transformers attain strong predictive performance, their distrib…
  • We address this gap by developing a framework based on tree-based ense…

摘要引擎:抽取

正文提要

arXiv:2608.20384v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multimodal affect and behaviour classifiers that fuse heterogeneous text, audio, and visual streams must simultaneously achieve competitive accuracy and produce human-understandable explanations of the cues driving their decisions -- a dual objective that current high-capacity models, notably Transformers, only partially address. While Transformers attain strong predictive performance, their distributed representations and deep nonlinearity make it difficult to assign meaningful importance weights to individual multimodal features, limiting their use in trust-sensitive applications such as clinical affect monitoring and educational assessment. We address this gap by developing a framework based on tree-based ensembles that balances accuracy and interpretability. The framework encodes each modality into tokens, extracts and clusters concepts to reduce dimensionality, routes the fused modalities through tree-based ensemble classifiers, and interprets trends using a novel modified feature importance metric. The modified importance reduces the influence of the negative class in binary classification tasks, thereby improving indicator or marker detection. The proposed tree-based ensembles -- Linear Discriminant Tree (LDT), Linear Discriminant Forest (LDF), and Linear Discriminant AdaBoost (LDAB) -- achieve F1-mod gains of 4.3\% over the Multimodal Transformer and accuracy gains of 3.0\% over the primary interpretable multimodal baseline, Interpretable Multimodal Routing (IMR). The proposed multimodal feature importance extracts salient inter-modal concepts with substantially higher human-annotator agreement scores than default feature importance (62.2\% vs.\ 43.2\% on IEMOCAP; 46.7\% vs.\ 32.1\% on CMU-MOSI).

来源:https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.20384

打开官方原文 站点原文页 可信分区 本信源更多 今日简报 分享图 RSS 稍后再看列表